Site Tools


gazettearchive:gazettevol19:broadgauge_society-gwr-w5_van

Converting a GWR V2 PBV into a W5 Hounds Van

SQL Server
DRIVER={SQL Server};SERVER=sql11.hostinguk.net;DATABASE=gaugegu1_gog2;UID=gaugegog1;PWD=g2Fr8*r6=yN-_4DUs$z!45;

Broad Gauge Society
Email: webmaster@broadgauge.org.uk
Web: http://www.broadgauge.org.uk/

Chris Gwilliam
Source: Gazette Volume 19 No. 11 May 2016

The Great Western Railway passed majestically through its rolling shires, a green and pleasant land, but much frequented by foxes. Until the dawning of a new age of enlightenment, where you found foxes, you also found hunting. To hunt foxes you needed packs of foxhounds, and to increase their range of operation transport was essential. So in the early 20th century the GWR obliged the masters of four hunts by providing four-wheel vans reserved for the conveyance of hounds. These were conversions from V2 Passenger Baggage Vans, and were re-diagrammed as W5. Two of the V2s were themselves re-builds dating from 1877, using even older coach underframes of 1860s vintage with new bodies. The van for the Culmstock Hunt, which had both foxhounds and otter hounds, was converted to W5 in 1904, renumbered as 86, and survived in revenue service until 1931, at which point its body was de-mounted and used for storage. The Curre Hunt operated from near Chepstow, with a pack of pure white foxhounds. The van-to-hounds conversion for this hunt followed in 1905, was renumbered 46, moved to Badminton in 1917, and was withdrawn in 1929.

Non-identical twins, the 1905 van on the left, the 1922 version on the right.


The remaining two vans were built new as V2s to Lot 146 in 1877, but unlike the two above were not re-numbered. No. 483 was converted in 1903, and 480 followed in 1910. Withdrawal dates were 1931 (or 1910, expert opinion is divided) and 1925 respectively. GWR records show that 480 was branded ‘Return to Whitland’ at some point, and 483 was allocated to the Swansea division, both being fitted with two additional roof ventilators; I have no photo of the vents but I assume they were the same ‘trumpet and wind vane’ pattern as fitted to horseboxes of that period.

Tantivvy and Tally-ho – the hunt for materials and information.
No kit exists for the W5, but a 7mm/ft Diagram V2 etched brass kit does, and a modeller wanting one of these rare hounds vans can, without undue difficulty, undertake the same conversion as the GWR, which principally consists of adding a droplight to the left-hand panel of the pair of luggage doors on each side, which had been blank until then. Bars were added to the inside of the new droplights and to the two small lights on the van end. The former guard’s compartment became accommodation for the whipper-in and other hunt staff, so it presumably had some sort of seating fitted. The only photographs of a W5 I have found show No.86 as a grounded body with lamp brackets missing, so I do not know if newer pattern brackets were fitted upon conversion. I’ve assumed not, and gone for the original smaller type. The ones in the kit are not a very convincing shape so I replaced them with spares from a Blacksmith kit. As the van in its converted state would carry non-railway personnel, alarm gear would have been fitted, in similar manner to contemporary horse boxes. The IKB kit provided cast lugs for the alarm apparatus, the BGS version did not, so I used some little castings which were originally part of a Dean bogie spring hanger. The junction boxes were fashioned from cubes of scrap plastic.

The vans already had dog boxes in their V5 incarnation (visible as small ventilated doors beneath the waist at the van end), which were of course retained after conversion, as the terriers which were used to dig out foxes from their lairs had to be kept separate from the larger hounds in transit to prevent dogfights. Much of the research on GWR hounds vans has already been done. You need a copy of the Historical Model Railway Society Journal Vol 14 No 9, in which Jack Slinn has written the definitive history. Additionally, Vol14 No.3 has an article on the V2s, including a 4mm/ft scale drawing. A tabular list of conversion dates by J H Lewis is included with the kit instructions, though it differs in some details from the Slinn account.

View Halloo – the kit
The etched kit for the V2 was originally made by IKB Models, and is now marketed by the Broad Gauge Society. I’ve had one of the former in stock for years, intending to build No. 46 for myself, as I have a personal connection: my late grandfather Sid Gwilliam was at one time a bee-keeper for Lady Curre. And then a friend bought the BGS kit and prevailed upon me to build one for him as well so I tackled the two in tandem; I swithered for ages between lake and pre-1908 chocolate and cream livery for mine, before settling on the latter, and his will be the same van but in the 1922 version of the classic GWR colours. So far as I can tell, these two vans were oil lit throughout their lives, the kit also provides castings for gas lamps and gas cylinders. The only difference between the IKB and BGS versions is that the former came with a prerolled brass roof, the latter has none so you need to source your own. I cut one to size from a sheet of tinplate salvaged from a canister which once held a bottle of single malt whisky. The whisky of course makes a good stirrup cup, though you might want to delay drinking it until the conclusion of each modelling session, as complex soldering and a steady hand will be needed. You will also need two new droplights of course. I had brass spares in stock, but if you don’t it’s no great hardship to cut a couple to size from thin card or plastic, using the ones on the etch as templates. A coil of thin steel wire is provided to spring the suspension if you choose to use the system in the kit. I dislike it and went for an alternative solution as outlined below. No straight brass wire is provided in either kit, and you’ll need to source a supply of 0.45mm, 0.7mm and some 0.9mm diameter rod for brake pull-rods and the like.

I am increasingly exasperated by the failure of kit providers to check contents; more often than not I find promised parts missing when I open the box. The IKB version turned out to be minus all four buffer castings and heads so I provided replacements, smart pre-sprung ones with brass shanks and steel heads which Adrian Rowland used to sell when he was marketing Northstar LNWR kits – ie taper shank, round head, round baseplate. They are a bit on the large side, but with internal springs they are very easy to fit and I don’t think the slight discrepancy in size is too noticeable. The BGS kit was a serious offender in the missing/wrong bits department: it had only four cast door vents, whereas six are needed. I found some spare Mallard/Blacksmith 12in depth etched vents and trimmed them to fit, adding a backing piece of 0.018in brass to each one to get sufficient thickness. It also had eight right handed J-hangers instead of four left and four right. I modified a replacement set of Roxey castings from my spares bin. There should have been two castings for the oil-lamp bungs and again I found a reasonable match among my spares.

Hark Forward – the bodywork

While the body sides were still flat, I drilled four 1.9mm holes in each of the LH door panels where the new droplights are to go, 3mm in from the beading, scribed lines to join up the four holes, then drilled a row of 1mm holes like postage stamp perforations along the scribed lines, used a Stanley knife to cut the tiny remaining webs, and removed the rectangle of unwanted brass. The ragged edges were cleaned up with Swiss files. The cantrail has a fold back section of brass. The instructions suggest it needs to be folded through 180 degrees, with the fold line on the outside, but this prevents the roof fitting snugly so I simply cropped it off entirely. The tumblehome is easy to form as the lower panels are halfetched and therefore bend readily. Just a little finger pressure applied from the rear, with the side held at a slight angle to a hard surface, will do the job.

It’s easier to do this before making the fold at the base of the side, despite what the instructions may tell you. Once you have a curve of the correct profile, score the fold line until a witness mark appears on the rear, and make a 100 degree fold. The curves which need to be formed in the duckets (or guards lookouts if you prefer) are more complex, the lower panel needing to be formed into an S-shape, the top panel into quite a tight radius. I found that using the stem of a needle file as a former helped a lot. Droplights and the dog box doors can now be soldered in. The etch has plenty of small hinges to be folded into L-shapes, but I found them fiddly to handle, so I used longer pieces of scrap brass strip from the edges of the etch, and cropped them to size after they had been fixed in position. I also found that the slots pre-etched for the hinges needed enlarging slightly.

Drilling holes in the door panel for the extra droplight
Forming the curves on the duckets
Scrap strip inserted from the rear to make the hinges

The droplights have been added, one in lowered position and one ducket has been soldered in place The door vents on the BGS kits are brass replacements from the Blacksmith spares as insufficient white-metal castings had been supplied The end steps are replaceents from Blacksmith, with a brass peg added to attach them

The ends are not identical. The one with the smaller lights goes at the hounds’ end, and also carries the steps for roof access. Two small holes need drilling for handrails at the step end, best done when the part is still flat. It will be easier to add the steps before the ends and sides are seamed up, except for the ones immediately above the buffers, which are best left until after the sides and ends are assembled. No slots or witness marks are provided for the end steps. I did not much care for them anyway as they were too skinny, etched to half-thickness, and thus had no fold line for the up- stand, so I rejected them in favour of spares from an old Blacksmith kit, and trimmed off the half-etched steps which are attached to the buffer backing plate. The drawing in Jack Slinn’s article (HMRSJ Vol 14 No3) will help with positioning. I marked in pencil, centrepunched, and drilled 1mm holes to take 0.9mm wire pegs which I soldered to the underside of each step so that they could be attached from the rear of the end panels, and not sweated onto the surface, giving a much stronger result. The kit is designed to have a double skin at each end for strength but the body is perfectly rigid without the inner skins and they serve only to add unneeded weight so I dispensed with them. If you intend to secure the body to the underframe with screws inserted from below you would do well to solder a pair of nuts above the outer holes behind the headstock, which need washers to decrease the diameter. You will also have to drill matching holes in the underframe. Don’t use the pre-etched one on the centre line as it will impede the shank of the coupling hook. I did not bother with this complication, and simply glued body and underframe together with Evostick after painting.

The corners were seamed up next, giving me a four sided box. Two strips of brass were soldered at cantrail level across the body, to give some rigidity and to provide a hand-hold during painting. The small parts can now be added: door ventilators (modified as described above in the case of the BGS version), backing plates for the T-handles, lamp irons, and last of all the vacuum hoses, which are white-metal and vulnerable to handling: at the compartment end the pipe is offset left of centre, and vice versa at the hounds’ end. Once the body has been washed and is paint ready, a card floor and a partition between the two compartments can be glued in place.



columns A Stanley knife was used to score the fold lines in the end before making the angle
Marking the position of the end steps before drilling holes for brass pegs

Scrap brass strips between the sides provide rigidity and a hand-hold

The alarm gear was cobbled up from spare bits and wire

Gone to Ground – the underframe
I’ve built lots of IKB coaches, and I loathe their sprung suspension system, which runs like a Stonehenge slab on logs – apart from which it looks ridiculous. What’s the point of providing lots of intricate brake detail if the appearance of the running gear is ruined by wholly unprototypical inside bearings? Nowadays I go for simplicity and make no use of any of the suspension components.

If you are going down my route, and not the designer’s, you will need to site the axleboxes by eye, as they will not be merely cosmetic but will be doing the job for which they were designed by the GWR. They will also need drilling out to accept Slater’s bearings; some of my castings had dimples at the rear to help with this, some did not. You will not need to drill too deeply. Be warned: my option is not for the faint-hearted. But that’s true of the IKB method as well; I would only recommend it to an experienced modeller with a masochistic streak.

I folded down the headstocks and the stirrup shaped brackets for the brake rigging, but not the tabs in the floor for the redundant suspension. Now fold the long seams on the solebar/W-iron components and offer them to the floor pan. There’s a long slot near the middle of the solebar to accept a matching tab on the floor. Attach an axlebox to each W-iron with just a dab of low-melt solder, and try fitting the wheels and bearings.

If you are lucky you will get axles which are parallel to each other and (in both planes) parallel to the headstocks, with all four tyres touching the ground when placed on a level surface and rolling freely in a straight line. If not some fiddling and re-fitting may be needed. Also, there should be no end-slop on the axles; if that’s the case you will need to add a couple of packing washers. It’s also worth trial fitting a buffer casting and checking to see that the ride height of the underframe matches that of another vehicle which you know to be correct (I used a Parkside van as a template). Once you are satisfied, seam up the solebars to the floor, add a dab of solder at each corner where solebar meets headstock, and add a little more low-melt to reinforce the axleboxes.

The solebars and W-iron etches tacked to the floor

Checking the ride height against another vehicle of known accuracy.

Springing the buffers

Fit the brass running board supports before attaching the J-hangers with low-melt.

J-hangers attached to the spring castings.

There are overlays with full rivet detail for the solebars. Note that these are handed, the one with five extra rivets at the centre line goes on the side of the underframe with the V-hanger. With this V-hanger on the near-side, the end with the steps will be to the right, and it’s worth scratching this information somewhere on the underframe so you get it right when body and base are finally united. The headstocks have overlays for the buffer backing plates and the coupling pockets. If you have found replacement end steps of 0.018in thickness you’ll need to crop off the half-etched steps which are attached to the buffer backing plates at the hounds’ end of the vehicle. Two styles of pocket are provided; you’ll need the one with the longer backing plate to blank off the holes for the safety chains which would have been removed upon conversion to W5 if not before. The broader horizontal of the pocket is nearer the track. The BGS buffer body castings had been predrilled (1.5mm I think) but to take the brass tube provided for the buffer shanks you’ll need to re-drill 1.7mm.

Cut the tube into four equal lengths and glue or solder them to the blackened brass buffer heads. You can now choose whichever method you favour for springing the buffers: I soldered four pieces 0.9mm nickel silver straight wire about 85mm long into the other ends of the tubes, slid the tubes into the buffer body castings, cranked the wire 90 degrees and soldered the ends to the floor inboard of the wheels. The etch has a very neat set of screw couplings: it’s a good idea to fit the couplings at this point, before brake rigging makes access to the rear of the headstock difficult. I added the J-hangers at this juncture, which was not clever, as the low-melt solder re-melted and detached the parts when I later used a higher melting point solder to attach the running board hangers. On the second van I learnt by the mistake and did things the other way round.

Running boards folded and in place.

Close-up of outside pull rods. Less solder would have been clever.

To the best of my knowledge these vans retained their lower running boards for the whole of their working lives. The hangers require a fairly complex series of folds to achieve the correct shape – a drawing in the kit shows you how, but I reversed the parts so the fold lines were on the outside. If you have a mind to, you could substitute the lovely lost-wax castings from Slaters, which are rather more robust than the etched ones provided.

Whipper-in – making it stop
Now for the interesting part – the intricate outside brake rigging. The etched sheet is like a lace doily with hundreds of little bits, so great patience is required, as well as a decent command of Anglo-Saxon.

The completed brake-gear, with gaps left in the diagonal pull-rods to avoid trapping the axles in place.

An exploded drawing shows where to put things; just be methodical, and stop when your eyes get tired or you run out of vocabulary. Note that two styles of brake shoe are provided. The ones shaped like bow ties are the ones you need. The halfmoon shaped shoes are for inside rigged brakes, so put them in your spares drawer along with the associated triangular yokes. The HMRJ drawing shows the vacuum cylinder with the ‘rabbit-ear’ pattern of cranks, and in the absence of photo evidence that’s the sort I used, not the straight levers. Again, both sorts are on the etch. I omitted part of the diagonal pull-rods from the vacuum cylinder to the outer brake levers to avoid trapping the wheels in place, but otherwise I think I used almost all the bits provided.

Hunting Pink – the painting process
The painting and lining is fairly complex as they were almost certainly fully lined throughout their lives, and post-1927 plain chocolate and cream will not do. They started in the ornate pre-1908 livery, with chocolate lines inside the cream panels and on the door vents, and chocolate ends lined black, with gold and black lining on the beading. Then they went into lined all over 1908 chocolate and/or all over lined 1912 lake upon repainting, and at the repaint after 1922 they reverted to lined chocolate and cream, but minus the chocolate lines in the cream panels, and with plain black ends. I sprayed both entire bodies with a satin black aerosol (which also serves as a top coat for the ends on the 1922 version). Then I airbrushed Comet cellulose chocolate over the entire early van, and the sides of the 1922 van, with the ends masked off. Next day, more masking of lower panels and all ends, and a coat of Comet cream on the upper panels. Wait another day. A coat of varnish was then airbrushed on to protect the cellulose paint, which is vulnerable to damage if any mistakes are made in the lining-out and attempts are made with thinners to correct matters. I used Wickes interior satin, which I thinned 60/40 with petrol (used outdoors of course). I was using it for the first time and found that, even well stirred, it dried slightly glossier than the 50/50 mix of Ronseal gloss and Ronseal matt I have used until now.

While the varnish was drying I got on with the roofs, using scrap brass from old etches for sweating on the rainstrips, which have a very shallow arc. 0.9mm brass rod would also be a suitable material. The lamps and bungs were inserted in holes drilled on the centre line, positioned using the V2 drawing referred to earlier and some guesswork based on photos. The washed roofs then had a coat of grey aerosol undercoat, a white topcoat, and brushpainted Humbrol Matt Chocolate below the rainstrips; the cellulose chocolate can’t be brushed as it dries too quickly, and masking to spray it would be likely to cause the white to lift.

The underframes were coated in aerosol satin black, then airbrushed with a thin coat of varnish to which a few drops of matt chocolate were added. Plain black always looks artificial to my eye. The Mansell wooden wheel centres were brushed with a 50/50 mix of matt chocolate and red oxide enamels, and stray spray was removed from the tyres with cellulose thinners on a tissue. Running boards were always unpainted wood, which I replicate with a brushed mix of pale grey and chocolate enamels.

The lining out requires patience and a steady hand. I always start with Humbrol 85 black horizontals, then verticals. Then I use a bow pen to draw in arcs at on the cusp of the beading at each panel corner in Humbrol 24 Desert Sand, then yellow horizontals, then verticals. The horizontal beading around the waist panels is very narrow, so it’s tricky to get yellow/ black/yellow on the beading without the yellow falling into the panel. A cocktail stick with a wedge cut in one end is a good tool for removing any minor areas of stray paint. More major errors mean a wipe off with a tissue and white spirit, and a second attempt. The pre-1908 example, as detailed above, also needed a very fine brown line on the flat of each panel about 2mm in from the beading, and on the ribs of the door vents.

The body has been airbrushed in cellulose GWR chocolate, then masked ready for the cream to be applied to the upper panels.

Underframe, body and roof of the 1905 version ready for final assembly using Evostik.

Who Let the Dogs Out? – The problem of lettering the Hounds door
No transfers are available for the word HOUNDS in the door panel, but the word can be built up using letters from RESTAURANT and THIRD CLASS on the 4mm HMRS sheet, the 7mm ones being too large. There’s no O, but an inverted C with the gap in the circle touched in with a tiny dab of paint will do the job. Strictly speaking the H should be a little larger than the rest, but I’ll live with the slight discrepancy. Placing the crests is a bit problematical as photo evidence is scant. Normal practice was to avoid putting the large round gartered crest on doors, but as close to the centre line as possible. However, one of the photos in Jack Slinn’s V2 article shows a crest on a door. In the end I decided to go with another photo in the same article, which has the crest offset towards the dog box. The running numbers changed positions between the two versions of the chocolate & cream livery. The pre-1908 van had its numbers in the panels beneath the cantrails, the 1922 version had them placed in the waist panels near the ends.

There are dozens of commode handles and T-handles on the etch, but they are flat and flimsy, so I jettisoned them in favour of a set of Slaters’ lovely lost-wax commodes I’d bought in, and some lost-wax T-handles from, I think, an old RJH kit. The longer handles alongside the former guard’s doors were formed from 0.7mm brass wire instead of the ones on the etch. The whole caboodle then had a second coat of satin varnish to protect the transfers, before glazing and insertion of window bars.

The final assembly of underframe, body and roof can then be made. End handrails from 0.7mm wire were formed, fitted and painted black. A very light dusting of weathering powder on the underframe and ends completed the operation. Overall, an enjoyable project and the end result was two rare but useful vans. Or am I barking up the wrong tree? Sorry, I’ll get my coat.

The 1922 version completed and ready for dispatch to its new owner.

The 1905 version completed.

gazettearchive/gazettevol19/broadgauge_society-gwr-w5_van.txt · Last modified: 2021/11/15 16:46 by 127.0.0.1