In order to avoid too many electrically
operated points on the exposed parts
of my garden railway I have several
points where the blades are moved by the
passage of the trains themselves. A good
example of their use is where a single
track enters and leaves a passing loop.
The blades are biased so that a train
entering the loop will automatically take
the left hand line, while a train leaving the
loop will push the blades aside with its
wheels.
Some method had to be devised to hold
point blades in the biased position, but
not to hold them too firmly, or the wheels
of a train coming off the loop would be
unable to push them to the opposite side.
On consideration, a spring would not be
the answer, as (a) springs are usually
made of steel, which would soon rust,
exposed to the elements, and (b) the
pressure to push a spring would need to
increase the more the spring is
compressed. Something was needed that
would lightly and positively hold the
blade against the stock rail, but that could
be easily pushed aside by the passage of
wheels.
The answer proved to be a weight on a
pivot connected to the end of the tie bar
by a wire which either pulled or pushed
the blade against the stock rail. See
diagram1. The top picture shows the
weight pushing, and the lower picture the
weight pulling.
The weights I made are from 1mm thick
brass, about 25mm long by 10mm high,
the sizes not being critical. It just so
happened that I had some 1mm thick
brass, but I could have easily soldered
together some thinner brass left over from
a loco kit to make up near enough that
thickness. The U shaped bracket is made
from scrap etch brass and screwed to the
track base. The pivot is an 8BA bolt. The
upper hole in the weight is linked to a
hole in the tie bar by a length of 22SWG
nickel silver wire. A thicker wire would
have been okay but anything thinner
could be accidentally bent out of
adjustment too easily. All the holes were
drilled with generous clearances to ensure
that there was no chance of friction. The
wire was shaped in such a way that it kept
the end of the weight just above the
ground at all times.
The point blades also needed to pivot
very easily, so were made no longer than
necessary. The pointed ends of the blades
were connected to the tie bar by long
brass pins passing up through holes in the
tie bar, then bent back and soldered to the
bottom inside edge of the blades. The
other end of the blades were pivoted in
the same way, but to pieces of scrap etch
soldered under the stock rails or under
the closure rails. These pivots were made
well enough to ensure that the blades
remained upright and in line with the
fixed rail. I have tried Peco rail joiners as
pivots to save the complications of that
just described, but found that they were
not man enough to survive the rigours of
a garden railway. The blades were
electrically connected at the pivoted end
to the stock rails by lengths of flexible
wire “floppy” enough not to interfere
with the easy movement of the blades.
In some cases I found that the weights
were not quite heavy enough to pull or
push the blades, so it was a simple matter
to solder a little more material to the end
of the weights to give them a bit more
oomph.
See diagram 2 for the electrical
connections. This also shows the one
disadvantage of automatic points—the
dead frog. The rest of the point blades, or
closure rails, need to be cut at the spot
before the back of the wheel flanges are at
risk of shorting against the opposing rail.
From there until beyond the V of the
crossing the frog needs to be dead, which
can be a problem for short wheelbase
0-4-0s unless they are fitted with a hefty
flywheel. On my layout the shortest dead
frog I have is on a Y point where
diverging tracks are both at 6’ radius.
That frog measures just 40mm, but I have
found that on my largest radius automatic
point that measurement increased to
70mm.
Diagram 3 shows how I have found
automatic points useful on my own
layout where a triangular junction off the
“main line” leads into a terminus under
cover in a shed. Only points A and D are
motor operated for trains wishing to enter
(or in the case of D, leave) the shed. B, C
and E are automatic and I have drawn the
blades to show which way they are
biased. Point F has no control at all, as
trains pass over it in only one direction,
pushing the blades as they go.
Reliability? I have used automatic points for quite a few years and it is now a rare happening if one of them causes a problem unless it is an operators’ error. The classic “boob” is stopping a train when half of it has crossed a point, and then reversing! One requirement I have found by trial and error is to allow a decent amount of space around and below the tie bar so that one can easily remove debris which can accumulate there. I spend a few minutes before each running session to check and remove any bits of grot with a piece of bent wire if necessary. Lightweight plastic wagons benefit from the addition of some lead weight to help them push a blade over, but most garden railway owners will do this as a matter of course to lessen the effect of high winds. Loco pony trucks may also need a little “extra” to keep them down.